But why are we even framing criticism as either negative or positive? The most interesting book reviews are those that make me think, the reviews that bring out interesting themes in a work. Good criticism is not merely about liking or disliking a book or exploring a book’s merits and failings. Good criticism, for me, is about trying to understand how the book works and what it offers, or doesn’t, to contemporary culture, where the book fits within a tradition, and how it speaks to history.

roxane gay, here. AMEN. (via isabelthespy)

Yes, this.

(via kateelliottsff)

(Reblogged from shwetanarayan)

Notes

  1. missamberly reblogged this from spaceconfessional
  2. spaceconfessional reblogged this from rosezemlya
  3. naxios10 reblogged this from rosezemlya
  4. rosezemlya reblogged this from rosezemlya
  5. aragingquiet reblogged this from dakotacityukuleleorchestra
  6. dakotacityukuleleorchestra reblogged this from shwetanarayan
  7. inarumabo reblogged this from kateelliottsff
  8. 21janeeyre reblogged this from theopensea
  9. -purplevanity reblogged this from gogglesque
  10. sunripple reblogged this from gogglesque
  11. gogglesque reblogged this from thishedgehog
  12. queenfancycat reblogged this from redheadbouquet
  13. affably reblogged this from aka14kgold
  14. grimdark-misandrist reblogged this from redheadbouquet
  15. redheadbouquet reblogged this from battlestardidactica
  16. writingguild reblogged this from kateelliottsff
  17. autie-turtle-cat reblogged this from alexandraerin
  18. regina-and-the-dragons reblogged this from alexandraerin
  19. theopensea reblogged this from manzanasverdes
  20. saltysalmonella reblogged this from rosezemlya
  21. battlestardidactica reblogged this from isabelthespy