“Anything women can do, men can do better”.
That’s why the concept of a “women’s clinic” is somewhat absurd.
There isn’t anything a woman could go through that at quite a few men out there couldn’t go through.
… Ay. Got this from genderbitch’s site. I shouldn’t be surprised.
I’m going back to bed, it is too early for this nonsense.…
lemme get this straight, so genderbitch claims to hate MRAs yet makes a claim that i think even MRAs would find difficult to justify
In all fairness:
http://nidhhoggr.tumblr.com/post/28236243198/tal9000-why-is-womens-clinics-that-want-to
Nidhoggr says it, and gb replies with:
I wish fuckers who don’t know shit about what’s being talked about would shut the fuck up until they do. Maybe even past then. As penance for even wanting to talk about shit they’re ignorant as fuck about.
So, giving credit where it’s due, I guess.
Lol, so cuz I disagree with some pile of shit MRA in a reblog, apparently my site is a haven for nastiness like this now? “Got this from genderbitch’s site. I shouldn’t be surprised. ” Damn right you shouldn’t be surprised, but not for the bullshit reasons you implied, cuz I regularly attack MRAs, radscum and other bigoted shitstacks.
Is everything you do spin and lies or do you sleep sometimes, ptsdreamy?
Don’t take it too hard that they’re grabbing things out of context and attributing words to you that you’d only quoted for specific purposes. They’ve all been feeling down since Cathy Brennan told them she was a trans woman. Right from her site: “I am a trans woman.”
Hey, alexandraerin, address me. Respond to me.
Don’t bring up Cathy Brennan like she’s some bugaboo monster, in a thread where she’s not been mentioned.I get that you have a hate-on for her (quelle surprise!), but she doesn’t factor in this conversation, and I’ll kindly thank you not to try to go off-topic. If you don’t have anything to contribute, stay quiet.
I was responding to Kinsey, thank you very much. If I were to address someone further up thread directly, it wouldn’t actually be you as you’re the one who “in all fairness” pointed out that the thing you’re all hate-loling about Kinsey saying isn’t something that Kinsey actually said.
Though I think you’re being a little too… soft… in your correction there. The people above you are basically arguing that because those words appeared on Kinsey’s blog, that’s somehow typical of her and “nasty”. But the same words now appear on all our blogs… yours, mine, everybody who has reblogged to comment on them.
Talk about hypocritical. Talk about not caring about the truth, as long as it suits one’s preconceived dogma.
Now that’s why I emphasized “directly” in the first paragraph. My invocation of an unrelated person (Ms. Brennan, in this case) with words that appeared on her blog but didn’t actually represent something she said (a title of a post where the title is a question written from the point of view of a hypothetical/generalized trans* woman) is a parallel to the original post above.
You see?
Cathy Brennan I regard as fair game not because I have a “hate-on” for her but because she publicly encourages this kind of nonsense and regularly indulges in it herself. That, and she actively lobbies against my existence.
Actively lobbying against someone’s existence > a snide joke here or there.
In case you were wondering.
But anyway, you folks are all about how objective and reasonable and rational you are and how crazy and violent and desperate we are, and how we take things out of context. So let’s have a little more reasonableness from you. Let’s hear you say in no uncertain terms what you think of the disgusting manipulation of someone’s words that started out this thread. Let’s hear whether you think the person above owes Kinsey an apology for making it appear that she said something that she reblogged to respond to, as you have reblogged to respond with me.
Your page says you want to deal brutally with hypocrisy. So deal brutally with the hypocrite who started this thread.
Since, you know, you wanted to converse with me.
